NO rosary during eucharistic adoration [exposition]

    1. The USCCB’s words

“The Stations of the Cross is an ancient and venerable devotion which is designed to foster a devotion to and meditation on the mystery of the Passion of Christ. As commendable as such a devotion may be, it can never fulfill the purpose of Eucharistic adoration, that is to draw us more deeply into the mystery of Christ’s presence in the Holy Eucharist. Therefore, neither the Stations of the Cross nor any other devotion should be prayed during exposition of the Eucharist" (citation: 

"Devotions and Eucharistic Adoration,"

 https://www.usccb.org/prayer-and-worship/prayers-and-devotions/adoration/devotions-and-eucharistic-adoration#:~:text=As%20commendable%20as%20such%20a,during%20exposition%20of%20the%20Eucharist.)

 

    2. No Rosary during adoration:

  • Note that the Rosary is a devotion according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church 1674: "Besides sacramental liturgy and sacramentals, catechesis must take into account the forms of piety and popular devotions...in various forms of piety...such as...the stations of the cross...the rosary..." (see also: 2678, 2708, 971)
  • The Diocese of London says:
    "    Popular Devotions, even one as highly esteemed as the Rosary (or novenas, etc.), are not acts of the Church's public liturgical worship as such, and so the legislation clearly discourages the use of devotional prayer to the blessed Virgin Mary or the rest of the saints as the verbal common prayer at an exposition. The reason for this is that prayer at an exposition is focused upon Christ, rather than on the Blessed Virgin Mary or the saints" 

(source: "EUCHARISTIC ADORATION AND EXPOSITION."

https://dol.ca/documents/2018/11/Eucharistic%20Adoration%20and%20Exposition%20-%20February%202013.pdf#:~:text=Popular%20Devotions%2C%20even%20one%20as,Further%2C%20liturgical%20payer)


What about Scripture reading? 

  • The same USCCB guideline notes that “To nourish personal prayer, there may be readings from Sacred Scripture with a homily or brief exhortation, which lead to a better appreciation of the Eucharistic Mystery."

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. Alexander Pruss's Blog called, "Sexual Orientation" against same-sex sexual relationships: Minh's commentary

  Consider the following two claims that some people seem to accept [so, for example, i guess that most secular college students would accept these 2 claims] : Same-sex and opposite-sex sexual relationships are on par [so it’s not like it’s better to be in a same-sex sexual relationship than opposite sex sexual relationship, and vice versa–no…rather, they are on par or equal to each other]. Heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality are on par [so it’s not like it’s better to be heterosexual than homosexual , or it’s not like it’s better to be homosexual than heterosexual, or it’s not like it’s better to be bisexual than homosexual, or it’s not like it’s better to be bisexual than heterosexual–no! Rather these three orientations are simply on par or equal] , and persons of one orientation do not have reason to try to change to another [so, if i’m a homosexual, i do not have reason to try to change to be heterosexual or bisexual, etc. because they are all on par to each other]...
Read more

Q: "Why does Paul mention James before Peter (Galatians 2:7-9) and why is Peters' name used as "Cephas" instead sometimes?"

  Firstly, if the hidden assumption behind the question here is, “Any name mentioned first in a list of names necessarily means that the person holding that name mentioned first is superior to all others in that list” then we should recognize that the assumption is not always true. Now, of course, Peter’s name is mentioned first when it comes to the listing of apostles, and that’s a case to be made for his superiority among the apostles. But, this type of conclusion is made with (1) the additional biblical and historical data that shows Peter was in fact the leader of the apostles, and (2) the fact that Peter is consistently mentioned first not only one time, but many times over and over, making it more likely. Second, I want to recognize that this is a good question, and we can actually see the logical pattern as to how Paul lists the four people (me [Paul], James and Cephas and John), as opposed to being merely random. But before that, it is important for us readers to recognize ...
Read more

justification

  Second Council of Orange (AD 529): CANON 18 . “That grace is not preceded by merit.  Recompense is due to good works if they are performed; but grace, to which we have no claim, precedes them, to enable them to be done.” Council of Trent on Justification: “but we are therefore said to be justified freely, because that none of those things which precede justification-whether faith or works-merit the grace itself of justification . For, if it be a grace, it is not now by works, otherwise, as the same Apostle says, grace is no more grace.” Efficient cause: “ a merciful God who washes and sanctifies gratuitously, signing, and anointing with the holy Spirit of promise, who is the pledge of our inheritance” Meritorious cause: “ His most beloved only-begotten, our Lord Jesus Christ, who, when we were enemies, for the exceeding charity wherewith he loved us, merited Justification for us by His most holy Passion on the wood of the cross, and made satisfaction for us unto God the Fat...
Read more